Someone read
that post and expressed concern.
Someone who is smart, sensible and not a knee-jerk hysteric.
Someone who owns what I refer to as a "power breed".
Seems that I am sounding dangerously close to a BSL type when I talk about the physical strength or the inherent protective/territorial tendencies of one breed vs. another. In other words, it is very provocative, and not in a good way, when I describe a Dobermann picking up a child by the head and shaking him, and asking if a Yorkie could do that. It is not cool to imply that perhaps the giant molosser type dogs should not be compared favorably or even neutrally to Golden Retrievers or Poodles when it comes to selection of a family pet. The most important thing for dog professionals to emphasize is that ALL dogs require responsible upbringing, training and management. Leave breeds out of it.
No. I won't leave breeds out of it.
Not until every breed apologist who dares to stand up at a public hearing and attribute to toy breeds the same potential for damage as the breeds in question sits down.
Not until every well-meaning dog person who trots out a story about how viciously they were mauled by a Cocker Spaniel shuts up and considers the pain and trauma suffered by the victim the current conversation is about.
Not until every Pollyanna Rescue Martyr and every gene salesman who advertises in the glossy back pages of Dog Fancy stops calling their working breeds "gentle family guardians who require no formal training to tell friend from foe" or "affectionate couch potatoes who will protect by instinct alone".
Not until every wannabe trainerette with a copy of "Calming Signals" and a CPDT after her name stops attributing temperament to training methods, and spends one solid year of apprenticeship with a real dog trainer learning protection work.
We dog people are to blame. Before you point the finger at the media, at criminals and thugs, at stupid owners, at mean or incompetent trainers, turn it around on yourself. Admit what you have: a big dog with a strong instinct to defend property/persons/himself from people/predators/dogs (mix and match accordingly). A dog who may take a little extra work, and a little extra management. A dog whom you
shouldn't expect people to welcome with open arms, based on his size and his intimidating appearance. If you can educate people past that because your dog is so well-trained that he is a pleasure to be around, more power to you. But remember that he is
not an ambassador for the breed as it is, whichever breed it is. He is an ambassador for what it
should be.
What's that? Your dog is "no different" than a Golden Retriever or a Poodle?
If your breed is no different than a Golden Retriever or a Poodle, then why didn't you
get a Golden Retriever or a Poodle? The appearance?
Wait a minute, I thought that people who bought (or "adopted") dogs based on their appearance were shallow and not worthy of being granted ownership. What does that make you?
Oh, I see. Your breed is more intelligent/more devoted/more protective than another breed. So, there are only differences in the positive? No negatives? Not even one? That "protective" thing: that never goes the wrong way, does it? Only if you "abuse" the dog, right?
Right.
At the rescue where I trained, the worst hand-wringers and social judges tended to be lots of whiny, perimenopausal women who loved to condemn those big, mean men who kept Dobermanns so they would "look tough". I enjoyed pointing out to my colleagues that nothing spoke more loudly and pathetically of psychic penis envy than the attachment these weak, sad broads had for their large, male power breeds. "See, I'm a
poor victim of life but this big, strong
DOG represents my
SOUL (or my
HEART or my
COURAGE etc)". No, actually, he represents your DICK, ladies, and the fact that you let him growl your husband out of bed tells me everything I need to know about the state of your mind.
My answer to my dog friends is this: get out of denial. Admit that what we own and love is not the same as what most civilians think of as a simple family pet. And they never
should think of them as a simple family pet. One of my favorite dog books is
"Eminent Dogs, Dangerous Men" by Donald McCaig. It is an incredibly moving, honest account of working Border Collie life and Mr. McCaig's adventures as he tries to acquire a new dog in Scotland. At the end of this worshipful study of his favored breed, Mr. McCaig does something wonderful: he tells his readers to NOT get a Border Collie as a pet.
You dogpeople are right: when it comes to BSL, we are looking at a people problem, not a dog problem. But the people at the root of the problem are the people who look just like us. Clean your own house, ladies and gentlemen, or Uncle Sam is gonna come in and do it for you.